tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10946597.post113764197492616792..comments2023-07-18T01:24:01.098-07:00Comments on The Dark Star Gazette: the source of spamFalse Datahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07901490109393153935noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10946597.post-1137645647380285932006-01-18T20:40:00.000-08:002006-01-18T20:40:00.000-08:00I'm having a bit of trouble finding that article. ...I'm having a bit of trouble finding that article. I assume you're referring to Deputy Attorney General James Gorelick's testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee in 1994? Fox news mentions it <A HREF="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,179318,00.html" REL="nofollow"> here</A>, with a bit more info in an op-eds by the <A HREF="http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=20944" REL="nofollow"> Frontpagemag.org </A> and the <A HREF="http://www.dailyemerald.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2006/01/12/43c61a48dc968" REL="nofollow"> Oregon Daily Emerald</A>. This <A HREF="http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/01/12/003221" REL="nofollow"> Slashdot thread</A> has an interesting exchange on the subject, suggesting that <A HREF="http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/eo/eo-12949.htm" REL="nofollow">Executive Order 12949</A> of 1995, creating certain authorizations required by FISA (which suggests a need to comply with FISA), came out when Clinton bowed to pressure to follow that law.<BR/><BR/>As far as I can tell, the exact extent of the President's war powers is still an open question. The <I> Steel Seizure </I> case put some fairly sharp limits on it, but the current Supreme Court is a very different institution and might revise them.False Datahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07901490109393153935noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10946597.post-1137642326062089142006-01-18T19:45:00.000-08:002006-01-18T19:45:00.000-08:00I bought a computer from Apple and immediately sta...I bought a computer from Apple and immediately started getting spam from 3rd parties offering software. Hadn't got the computer yet! They stopped after about a month.<BR/><BR/>Re the Fisa Flap: Look at what the NYT said about the wiretaps that evaded Fisa in the Clinton Admin. Interesting.Susihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08491909280925749677noreply@blogger.com